I’ve been reading so many books lately that it’s messing
with my brain. My mind comes up with all these words and I don’t know what to
do with them. So this either means I have to start writing or I am becoming
schizophrenic. Either/or. So for an outlet and maybe to stave off my eventual
psychosis a bit longer, I have been writing a lot lately. Mostly book reviews
and random dialogue I come up with when sorting out arguments in my head. You
know. The usual.
This started as a book review and then ended up as…something
else entirely. So first you have just the book review, in case that is all you
are interested in and then you have the book review as it was originally
written and everything that goes with it. So many more things.
31. Blaze by Richard Bachman/ Stephen King: Richard Bachman is Stephen
King’s pen name from back in the day because he was under some kind of yearly book cap and he wanted to see
if his books would sell under a different/unknown name. Not surprisingly, the
Bachman books only sold a small amount of copies and, when Bachman was outed as
Stephen King, they sold way more copies which is really where it sucks to be a
Stephen King fan (I would say it sucks to be Stephen King himself, but it
doesn’t. That guy is doing just fine.).
It’s really just a sad story about a guy named Blaze who had little
chance in life to not be a criminal. When he was a child he suffered head
trauma after his father threw him down the stairs three times in succession, so
he is a little dim. From then on he goes
from foster home to juvenile detention to prison, you get the gist. He turns
con man and goes in for a long con and kidnaps a baby from a wealthy family and
hilarity ensues, but not really. And I don’t know who Steve was fooling, but
the book is obviously by him. Blaze has a touch of the shining and that is
something that reeks of a Stephen King character (the shining is a feeling
about something. Like you can find things easily, or you prepare yourself for
something that is about to happen though
you have no way of knowing. Like you bring the clothes in from the line (because
people still have clotheslines outside, I am sure) a few minutes before a
surprise thunderstorm. That kind of thing.). But that is really the only
supernatural element in this book and he barely touches on it. It’s just a very good human story about a
person you don’t normally think about, or try not to anyway.
*** Now the review in it’s long-winded entirety ***
31. Blaze by Richard Bachman/ Stephen King: Richard Bachman
is Stephen King’s pen name from back in the day because he was under some kind of yearly book cap and also he wanted to see
if his books would sell under a different/unknown name. Not surprisingly, the
Bachman books only sold a small amount of copies and, when Bachman was outed as
Stephen King, they sold way more copies which is really where it sucks to be a
Stephen King fan (I would say it sucks to be Stephen King himself, but it
doesn’t. That guy is doing just fine.).
I am usually dismissed as someone with shitty tastes in
literature from anyone that wasn’t already a SK fan. And I resent that. If you
aren’t a fan of the horror genre, I get that. But many of his books contain
nothing of the supernatural. I feel like I am yelling at you (I am). People are
very much against reading his work because of the name but really the man is a
great writer. I was biased against him at first as well, and I turned out all
right. But my path to Steve is a long story for another day today.
I grew up reading the normal girl things that a girl reads. Babysitter’s Club. Judy Blume. R.L.
Stine. Goosebumps. Scary Stories to Read
in the Dark. My favorite Book was Wait
Till Helen Comes and it scared the shit out of me. I read it again not too
long ago and it holds up.
As a teenager, I really don’t think I read all that much
which is odd because I wasn’t doing anything else. Seriously. I had very little
to do in high school. I wasn’t in anything extracurricular, I didn’t have a
job, I surely was not involved with any form of boyfriend and I didn’t even do
drugs or drink then, so wtf did I do to fill my time? It’s ponderous, for sure.
For lack of anything else to read, I made the perilous
journey to chick-lit, Jennifer Crusie/ Helen Fielding/ Jane Green, one in the
same. I guess this was college. I don’t think I read too much in college
because I was too busy being an idiot. Like everyone from age 18 – to about 27
I’d say. Just dumb shits. All of them. What I do remember reading in college
besides the novelization of Romantic Comedies (bad ones), I was forced to read,
which was ok with me.
I took two classes in college that I adored. Women’s literature
and children’s literature. In Children’s
Lit, I read every children’s book there was. We had to read 25 books and write
a few sentences about each one just to prove that we read it. I think I read around 40. More Judy
Blume. Shell Silverstein. The entire Junie B. Jones Collection up until that
point. Also the classics like If You Give
a Mouse a Cookie and Rotten Teeth.
That class was so much fun.
In Women’s Lit, I think we had to read six books written by,
obviously, women. The ones I can remember were The Yellow Wallpaper, The Bluest
Eye, The Women of Brewster Place (If I looked real hard I could probably find
the syllabus from that class (type 2 hoarder)). I think that is when I got more
into women writers while also trying to distance myself from the garbage that
women were reading at the time that I did not enjoy.
This brought me to Cynthia Hiemel. Her books were mainly
compiled of essays about her life, relationships, yada yada. The most
memorable, If You Can’t Live Without Me,
Why aren’t You Dead Yet? Pretty sure this was when I was in my “Men are so
awful and weird” stage. But now I see that I chose the ones that were awful and
weird. I had many a chance with men that would have made excellent additions to
my admittedly short list of boyfriends from college, but I wasn’t interested in
those! I was in my early 20s and still dumb as shit. Anyway, I was reading
relatable stories from adult women so I kind of stuck with that genre for a
while. Bitch, Bleachy Haired Honky Bitch, Cherry,
The Broke Diaries, and a book that
continues to be my favorite; Hell Hath No
Fury. It’s a compilation of letters from some supremely pissed off women
throughout history. As a women who has written many a pissed off letter, I can
tell you that it is both accurate and fantastic.
Technically Women’s Literature could be Harry Potter. I read
it in college, but I feel this doesn’t even need to be said as a genre that I
enjoy or even a milestone in my history of books. I mean, everyone should read
Harry Potter, you just should. It’s like The
Diary of Anne Frank or To Kill a
Mockingbird. You just stfu and read it. It is something you read. It breaks
all literary boundaries and it is wonderful and all the good things that a book
should be. And I swear to you, I do not want to hear your bullshit about you
not wanting to read a children’s book and/or you have seen the movies so why
bother. You get out of my face with that. Mainly, because you are wrong. And I won’t waste my time with just a movie
watcher, I won’t do it.
My love for books of essays written by women brought me to
David Sedaris. If I had been born many years earlier as a gay man living all
over the world, I would be David Sedaris. I just would. Also, Chuck Klosterman
is known for his essays but he has two very good fiction books out there that I
enjoyed. The Visible Man and Downtown Owl.
I think I was around 19 when I saw Fight Club for the first
time. And I found out it was a book and I was all “Whaaaattt?? This movie spoke
to me, somehow, in my untainted 19 years of life, I must learn more this man
who speaks to my soul,” or some other emo-bullshit I probably wrote down at
some point. I started reading Chuck Palahniuk, and things got weird. If you
loved Fight Club, but it was a little too violent/”out there”/ strange for you,
don’t go any further down the Chuck Palahniuk rabbit butthole. It only gets
stranger from there and more disappointing. I haven’t read an entire book of
his since Pygmy (which I did
enjoy). Everything else has been
impossible for me to get through to the point where I get really pissed off. I
heard there was a sequel to Rant,
though. Is that right? I wouldn’t mind giving that a gander.
My love for Chuck Palahniuk brought me to zombie fiction
(partly because if you can read anything from Chuck, you are obviously able to
stomach the viler things in life), then to apocalyptic fiction (two of these I
can recommend, Day by Day Armageddon
and The Road) and then, begrudgingly,
to Stephen King.
When I was a teenager, I read Dolores Claiborne. For some reason it was sitting on the bookshelf
in the living room. My mom is a big reader, but usually only crime or romance
novels so I am really confused on where this book came from and why it was in
my house. I had seen the movie many times (excellent adaptation) so I figured I
would give the book a try and I loved it. But then I got all boy crazy and
feminist and shit and forgot about the book and my enjoyment of it.
How I picked Stephen up again was, I was forced into it. I
had a good friend that was a SK fan and he was like, “You should really read
this.” And I was all “Um, please. Stephen King is a hack! I can’t believe you
read this shit.” And he was all, “Shut up, though. You will love this.” So after
many days/months/years of foot dragging, I finally read Salem’s Lot. And to say that it was an amazing experience would be
a gross understatement. From then on I wanted every Stephen King book in my
head at once. And now I have become the annoying friend that is all “Ok, just
shut up and read this. Thanks.” But you should listen to me, I know of what I
speak.
Anyway. What was I saying? Oh yeah.
Blaze: It’s really just a sad story about a guy named Blaze
who had little chance in life to not be a criminal. When he was a child he
suffered head trauma after his father threw him down the stairs three times in
succession, so he is a little dim. From
then on he goes from foster home to juvenile detention to prison, you get the
gist. He turns con man and goes in for a long con and kidnaps a baby from a
wealthy family and hilarity ensues, but not really. And I don’t know who Steve
was fooling, but the book is obviously by him. Blaze has a touch of the shining
and that is something that reeks of a Stephen King character (the shining is a
feeling about something. Like you can find things easily, or you prepare
yourself for something that is about to
happen though you have no way of knowing. Like you bring the clothes in
from the line (because people still have clotheslines outside, I am sure) a few
minutes before a surprise thunderstorm. That kind of thing.). But that is
really the only supernatural element in this book and he barely touches on
it. It’s just a very good human story
about a person you don’t normally think about, or try not to anyway.